With Essay 4 basically done with, it's time to assess our progress. We've still got a few weeks left in the semester, and hopefully you're using your time outside of the classroom to revise your essays for possible better grades, so I'd like to give you time to do that. That's why I'm not giving your written homework to do for next week. But I am giving you reading homework, and a bit more than the usual amount. I'll get to that in a moment.
Right now, I'd like to start by reminding you, again, that your revised essays are due by the end of class, 12:15pm, on Wednesday, 4/29. If you need help getting the most points out of your revision, please don't hesitate to ask me. But also, realize that the Writing Center on campus is there to help you figure out how to get the most out of your revisions.
One thing in particular that you should consider in your revisions is that lesson of unintended plagiarism. Specifically, you must ask yourself: Are you presenting and discussing your sources fairly? In places where you're supposed to discuss your sources (your articles), you should do only that: Discuss your sources, what these sources' authors are doing, and what all that means. Keep that "Source Sandwich" handout nearby; it should help you with researched materials.
=-=-=-=-=
Now, let me give you your reading homework for next week. Keep in mind that I might throw a quiz without any special warning, especially if I feel that a discussion in class isn't really getting anywhere.
First of all, I'd like you to read the following article, "What ISIS Really Wants," by Graeme Wood, published in
The Atlantic in March 2015:
http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/02/what-isis-really-wants/384980/.
-- Be aware: Wood's article is part of a series of what many people call "long-reads." It's a fairly long article. So take your time with it. You don't have to read it all in one sitting. But see if you can make it through with some focused attention to specific discussions.
Next, I'd like you to read the following article, "
How Dzhokhar
Tsarnaev’s immigrant path explains his guilty verdict," by Asra Q. Nomani, published in The Washington Post on April 8, 2015:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-dzhokhar-tsarnaevs-immigrant-path-explains-his-guilty-verdict/2015/04/08/8a182054-da37-11e4-8103-fa84725dbf9d_story.html.
-- As for Nomani's article, notice that it's a discussion of a recently published book. In a way, this article is in the form of a book review. Partly, it's intended to invite readers to a discussion of the topic of the Boston Marathon bombing. But partly, it's also intended to convince readers to maybe pick up the book in question and to give it a considerate read.
=-=-=-=-=
And that's it for this week. Be sure to do your reading. And if you've got questions or concerns, email me right away.